Powered By Blogger

Thursday 15 March 2012

evalutation ( posted temporarily in word format due to difficulties on prezi)

AS SOON AS PREZI IS AVAILABLE ON MY COMPUTER IT WILL BE POSTED ONTO BLOGGER

  • In what ways does your media product use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?
Our media product both challenged and conforms with typical conventions of media products. It challenges conventions in the sense that we haven’t used any special effects and our sequence isn’t modified at all, it is not at all superficial and it is all natural and very lifelike. We understand that this challenges conventions because with all the bid budget films that are so popular currently it was a high risk move to make our filming so bland and real. However we could compare of sequence to that of paranormal activity, which is all shot through a video camera and was a huge success, so we felt that it could be easily achieved without using a range of effects and a different technologies to create our representations and meanings.
However on the other hand our product conforms with a real media product in the sense that we have copied a few of the conventions of a full length thriller film. We have chosen to have our titles and names at the start, set upon a blank screen which is something stereotypically associated with thrillers. So hopefully by doing this when the audience is viewing our product and they see the first opening seconds, they will automatically know what genre our film is which will then help with our representations later on. Also before any actual footage is shown we have created a quote about insanity made by a doctor, this also conforms to real media product because we have taken this idea from the film “insidious” and it is also associated with the “paranormal activity” films. So hopefully by doing this we have portrayed the genre of our film, and the audience will then have a more clear perspective of narrative and representations later on.
  • How does your media product represent particular social groups?
Our film is based around the mentally deranged, and we portray people with mental disabilities in a bad and dangerous way. Our character with a mental disability is shows wearing an all grey outfit that resembles that of someone from a lunatic asylum, which is coupled with the use of a baseball bat.  We believe that by doing this we represent people who have got mental problems as being dangerous and even threatening. We know that society’s views of people with disabilities is very fragile as it is, and a lot of films tend to go for these types of characters because it is more disturbing for the audience. For example in    “the shining” which is one of the most famous horror/thriller films ever the character is portrayed as going insane. And we thought by including this in our sequence it would represent mentally disabled people as being fragile and volatile, which would ultimately mean that it would have a greater impact on the audience because of the way the characters are represented.
  • What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
       Our sequence is obviously aimed at the film industry, but more specifically having done some research I would aim our sequence at a company such as “hammer film”  who in the past have specialised in making psychological thriller films. I think this would be a great institution for our product because it would be the best way to distribute our product, and if we were assisted by people who specialise in this genre of film it would therefore maximise our products potential.
  • Who would be the audience for your media product?
Due to the fact that I am a teenager/young adult, we thought that it would be a good idea to focus our attention on this specific age range, because we obviously know what is popular with teenagers at the minute. More specifically we decided to focus on males, because they are a large percentage of the audience for psychological thriller, so we felt that if we focused on the 16-25 age range for males. It would be the most successful because that audience would be more likely to relate to our storyline and pick up on our representations, especially if our sequence is the genre of film that they regularly watch.
We thought we would attract our audience ( young males) by having our main character as a young male, hopefully this would make our sequence seem more relatable, and therefore the representation would be more real, henceforth making our product more successful because it would have more of an impact.
  • What have you learnt about technologies from the process of constructing this product?
During our filming we realised the gravity of how difficult it was to actually film and direct something with proper equipment. At first it took us some time to get used to how to use the camera properly, and filming with a tripod was a new item for us so we had to do some adjusting. However we learnt most when performing our editing, we realised how long it actually took just do edit together a small sequence. And having done most of the editing myself I learnt how to use effects and transitions, which took a while to get used to because we had never used final cut express before.
  • Looking back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to the full product?
I felt as if the man difference between these two tasks was the efficiency in which we competed it, we knew how hard editing would be, so we made sure to get all of our filming done as soon as possible. This is something that we learned from our initial task, we definitely managed our time better so we had the maximum amount of time to focus on our product as possible.

Thursday 1 March 2012

my role in the planning process

Because there was only two in our group it meant that we both had a large amount of responsibility when it came to our product. We decided right from the start that I would be the one who put the thought and planning into what was going to happen, and Jack would be the one to carry it through. I took the role of writing our pitch and presenting most of it to the class, whilst jack designed the powerpoint and found the necessary information.

I also planned out the outline for our plot and storyboard, and Jack drew out the story board and put it onto paper. I completed the shooting script also. So ultimately I came up with the ideas and concepts behind what we were doing, and jack put most of it onto paper because he is natrually more artistic and I am more imaginative, we thought this would be the best way to gain the maximum mark from the process because we both used our strengths accordingly.

feedback from our original pitch

Before we had any of our filming done we presented our idea to our classmates in the form of a powerpoint. The feedback we recieved from our class was as follows:

They liked the concept of our idea
They liked the way we were going to represent our character
They Weren't sure how we were going to make our narrative clear to the audience.

From this feedback we decided not to change anything about our product idea, but we knew that from hearing this we had to put a lot of focus into our editing. We decided to keep assessing our product when in the editing process to decide weather or not the narrative was clear. Hopefully we could achieve this through transitions during the chase scene to show who was chasing after who and how we wanted this to appear to the audience.

Wednesday 22 February 2012

audience feedback/ why we decided on our questions

Following the completion of the first draft of our opening sequence we set up a session in which we could show our product to the rest of our class. We also created a questionnaire for our classmates to complete on what they thought of our product and how we should change it. Our questions included: How would you change the story-line of our sequence?, Do you think it works as an opener; could it be followed by a full length film?, and what would you change about our editing if it was your product?

These questioned have been designed to get the best possible advice and feedback for our product, we wanted to get a general consensus of what everyone thought about our product and what they would change. Because we knew that if our classmates had started to pick up on things, then the examiners would also, so we wanted to get rid of all the kinks to try and appeal to a mass audience.

encountered problems during second time filming

During the editing stage of our product we decided to get some more footage because of feedback that we had from the rest of our classmates and others outside the media group. Whilst this was mainly done to make our editing easier, and to maximize the potential of our final product. However it was a difficult move to make because the weather had changed and we were having a lot of snow. This for us presented a huge problem because we didn't want to spoil our continuity, this meant that we had to hold off filming and chose the best possible day for it.We had to wait for the snow to clear which meant that we had less time to edit our product together, again this was another risky move but hopefully in the long run it meant that our product would be better and we would have more things to discuss during our evaluation stage. We also had to wait until the correct time of day so that the lighting didn't fluctuate too much throughout our sequence.

main focus on our product

Because a large bulk of the marks for this task was based around our final product, I felt that it was in my best interests to put most of my focus and time into editing and tightening up the quality of our actual sequence. This has unfortunately lead to there being a decrease in effort going towards my blog, I wanted to put most of my focus towards the product. Also I felt that it would be easier to analyse my product and talk about it in detail if it had actually been completed, hopefully this decision will gain me a better mark even if it is risky.